Post referendum Trauma - From our Chair, Paul fisher
The dust is beginning to settle but we are still tripping over the debris. We now need clarity of vision; something that has not been evident from before the decision to call a referendum was made.
There was no plan and there is still no plan other than to revert to the dogmatic rhetoric of the past forty years.
The difference now is that the roof has been pulled down and the edifice of the United Kingdom has not only fractured but has collapsed; this will become ever more evident over the forthcoming months as we emerge from the ruins and visibility increases.
Everything has changed despite survivors clinging onto the relics of the past. There has been a quantum shift in everything; the paradigm has changed. The challenge is both to recognise the new situation and resolve the conflicts thus presented sensibly and pragmatically. The catalyst of the referendum has surprised everyone.
The political realignment now emerging, but not yet recognised by the main stream UK political parties, needs to happen. The 20th century bipolar left/right Labour/Conservative divide has consumed itself in failure, infighting and egoism. The Parties have failed to provide leadership and vision, are at war with themselves and have promoted self interest to the point of incredibility.
On the right, the dogmatic rhetoric of freedom has been sacrificed to the mantra of “control”. The narrative is 'no' to the free market and 'yes' to cartel market; an inversion of their dogmatic rhetoric. People are mere chattel to be regulated and their movement controlled. Products and services are to be controlled by international cartels for the lowest price and without regard to the social cost. Money is to be controlled by the cartel market casino and debased, creating debit and instability.
On the left, individual entrepreneurial spirit is to be crushed by inefficient and over bearing government. Products and services are tolerated but only as part of a grand alliance between the State customer and the Corporate giant controlled by an elite which harvests the taxes of enslaved citizens whose only choice is between State or Corporate dependency; the equivalent of modern day slavery. Money no longer has value as it is at the whim of the industrial/state machine to control. The gravy train is all embracing; so the Socialists have embraced capitalism and the Tories have abandoned the free market.
The referendum spawned the protesting extremes consisting of both Corbynites and Kippers thus splitting both main political parties down the middle effectively providing the springboard for these two 20th century dinosaurs to consume themselves and each other. Failure to exploit this opportunity will only prolong the agony of the death throes.
If ever there were a time when the reform of money were to be recognised, it is now. The last 100 years of relentless fractional banking has worked its magic; hedge funds are the euphemism for junk bonds, stock and bond markets markets are the euphemism for big business gambling or casinos and the denial that cyberspace is here and totally unregulated is manifest in the electronic “printing” of money which has destroyed wealth and created debt. It has contributed to the collapse of truly free markets.
Debt creates multibillionaires from the ether whilst simultaneously plunging vast swathes of humanity into debt. Now is the time to reform the very essence of money to again become a true store of value, a free market means of exchange and accounting unit.
The consequence of casino banking has been one of the factors which has created this maelstrom; the lesson is to grasp the nettle, as the world's 5th largest economy, and make the condition of joining the first and only post fractional banking currency in the world; a totally reformed pan European currency.
Social cohesion in the UK is disintegrating in front of our eyes now that the catalytic effects of the referendum emerge. Rich versus poor, privileged versus impoverished, celebrity versus ignored, mansioned versus homeless, metropolitan versus regional, posh versus chav, educated versus ignorant, articulate versus inarticulate, informed versus misinformed, young versus old … the list is endless.
However, the real confusion is nationality; what is the difference between being British and English? This fault line is reinforced when overlaid with referendum voting patterns and the consequent constitutional crisis. The hegemony of the majority English over the other 3 less numerous, yet equally legitimate nationalities, no longer stacks up; it has become meaningless. If the truth were told, it has always been thus but a traditional fudge always prevailed and this evidently is no longer the case.
The whole toxic immigration debate is the fifth dimension here. London has over two hundred nationalities represented in its population; small numbers but infinitely diverse and global. The nexus of the impact of globalisation is represented in London, not now only a national capital but in reality a global megalopolis, and growing. It has an infinite appetite for people. To deliver London's construction programme 60,000 artisans are needed now.
Germany is not concerned about their so called “immigration crisis” because their need is for half a million additional people this year.
The problem of social cohesion is home grown; it reflects the inability of society to adapt to vast global forces which need to be tapped rather than rejected with no plan for failure other than oblivion. Taking back control to preserve indigenous low paid jobs will ensure that British workers keep their low grade and paid jobs for life whilst expertise is imported as required; that is called a low wage, third world economy!
Continued interconnection of an ever smaller world, previously heralded as the “global village” is the key technological driver; cyberspace is here and its impact is omnipresent. Moore's Law scythes through the previously accepted pace of technological change and it is the UK's failure to embrace this new global reality that has left swathes of the country wallowing in the debris of the first industrial revolution. Communications in cyberspace, transport, business or governance have lagged demand and capability. High speed internet has been slow to embed. Road, rail, air and sea transport for people and goods is unfit for purpose.
Business has not been nibble to meet new challenges and governance has been slow to adopt the electronic age let alone cyberspace. All this is rumbling along in piecemeal fashion; clogged roads, no rail strategy, insufficient airport capacity and ebbing seaport infrastructure compared to a pan European plan for all of this. The 30-year delay in deciding the additional London runway, the flawed railway upgrade that does not include Scotland, Wales or Ireland contrasts starkly chimes sadly with the inability of government to upgrade governance to meet the demands of the cyber economy; the failure to administer the Health Service with a pan enterprise data base and processes to match.
Failed technology application is the real failure to invest in Britain’s future.
The real fault line in the UK post-BREXIT is the constitutional and legal Armageddon which awaits. This is not about nationalism, it is about rational governance which is fit for purpose. It is about consistent legal structures within the Nation State.
The best example of this utter mess which has resulted from tactical tinkering rather than strategic thought and planning is exemplified by the “Mid Lothian Question”. The real problem is that there is no English Parliament and not the popular view that the smaller component nations do not have enough localised power. The lack of a consistent unified governance structure is at the heart of these divisions.
In this strategy desert everything is possible except a workable solution which is exacerbated by an arcane and archaic voting system specifically adapted to support a bipolar political landscape. Having no firm foundation to view local constitutional issues, it is virtually impossible to embrace supranational concepts of democratic governance. How can a nation which has a totally undemocratic and fully appointed Upper House even conceive of a democratic tripodal international governance construct? The equation is unsolvable.
In summary, BREXIT has focused upon the depth of Britain's bankruptcy; a country which cannot come to terms with globalisation and its impact upon itself and its position in the world. Too much time trying to punch above its weight, it has now over reached itself.
Once BREXITEER euphoria has run its course, destroyed its proponents and architects, Britain will emerge as a further diminished place.
Historians will see it as the Waterloo of all campaigns following on neatly from Suez, end of century adventurism in the Middle East and indeed, in the longer cycle, a repetition of the colonial wars in North America, South Africa and Afghanistan.
They say that pride comes before a fall; in this case total arrogance precedes disaster and oblivion.